Do you even understand the idea of value? Because you keep insisting that there's value in an embryo, and yet unable to explain why, and then unable to assign value, only did i ask you to make choices to try to understand what value you actually assign to it. You do, apparently, get that value is not a dichotomy, because you said you value it less than a sentient life. But can't get anymore specific than that can you? And embryos sitting in a fridge is also an ethical problem, but once we use them to treat illnesses it's ok. But you don't want to explain why. Why are you even having this conversation at all if you just expect people to swallow your absurd statements or read your mind?
I only justified the unimportance of embryos. If you think it's absurd that I value something that can fix hunger than I do an embryo, well I don't see why someone should suffer, however little, for something else that does not have the capacity to feel, that's why. And you have tried so many times to say that that means I don't value human life, which includes sentient humans, and I've said again and again that I don't condone murder and you just keep bringing it up.
I'm fine with ethics, I just don't understand your brand.
I only justified the unimportance of embryos. If you think it's absurd that I value something that can fix hunger than I do an embryo, well I don't see why someone should suffer, however little, for something else that does not have the capacity to feel, that's why. And you have tried so many times to say that that means I don't value human life, which includes sentient humans, and I've said again and again that I don't condone murder and you just keep bringing it up.
I'm fine with ethics, I just don't understand your brand.
