P.S. For those prancing around singing about how "science" is on their side because of this technical definition...
"Science" doesn't weigh in on political or moral issues. It is not "on" anyone's side. You are simply citing a technical definition and acting under the delusion that somehow this scores a point for your team.
If you want to know why it doesn't, every skin cell in your body is a human cell and counts as "human life". You commit a genocide with a kill list rivaling Hitler and Stalin ever time you scratch your arm. We don't care about these "lives" from a moral or ethical standpoint because these human cells don't have brains.
"Science" doesn't weigh in on political or moral issues. It is not "on" anyone's side. You are simply citing a technical definition and acting under the delusion that somehow this scores a point for your team.
If you want to know why it doesn't, every skin cell in your body is a human cell and counts as "human life". You commit a genocide with a kill list rivaling Hitler and Stalin ever time you scratch your arm. We don't care about these "lives" from a moral or ethical standpoint because these human cells don't have brains.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist