(July 29, 2013 at 11:36 am)Slave Wrote: We're not talking a hypothetical future person though. We're talking about a growing human.
Actually, we are talking about a hypothetical future person. The fact that its a developing human is irrelevant.
We don't have rights because we are human. We have rights because we exist as people.
Brain = person.
No brain = not a person.
Can we please put the "well, technically it's a human life" argument to rest?
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist