(July 29, 2013 at 4:07 pm)Slave Wrote: My point is I took issue with people in this thread for their opinions on abortion and argued my stance on the matter.
I didn't ask what you were doing. I asked what your point was.
You bring up species classification. In fact, you and Frodo keep harping on it as if you both think it's some kind of slam dunk. How does species classification fit into a discussion of ethics or abortion rights?
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist