RE: Moon Landing conspiracy
November 20, 2014 at 7:52 pm
(This post was last modified: November 20, 2014 at 7:53 pm by lifesagift.)
(November 20, 2014 at 7:46 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(November 20, 2014 at 4:54 pm)lifesagift Wrote: I suspect most people have seen the photos and argument about cross hairs, and dust on the landing pods, and strange light sources etc etc which attempt to prove that the landing on the moon was fake.
I actually believe they did land on the moon, but I have a problem... the lunar module was about the size of a van? ish? so how did they get the lunar buggy onto the surface?
PS if you're about to post a reply and your response is going to be negative, improper, average, odd, obtuse, irrational, an argument, might change the focus, going off at a tangent or just mean ... go and find a maths forum to post on instead, they'll love you !!
No offense meant (really), but I don't think it's especially good form to try and dictate how other people respond to your posts.
Boru
Hilarious... it was a gag... they're all mathematical terms, hence the maths forum thing... lol
GET A GRIP MAN !!!!! ;o)
(November 20, 2014 at 7:52 pm)lifesagift Wrote:(November 20, 2014 at 7:46 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: No offense meant (really), but I don't think it's especially good form to try and dictate how other people respond to your posts.
Boru
Hilarious... it was a gag... they're all mathematical terms, hence the maths forum thing... lol
GET A GRIP MAN !!!!! ;o)
lol "mean" = average !!
PS if you're about to post a reply and your response is going to be negative, improper, average, odd, obtuse, irrational, an argument, might change the focus, going off at a tangent or just mean ... go and find a maths forum to post on instead, they'll love you !!