Creation/evolution3

[The Grand Nudger]

What was the claim I made then that set this line of thought in motion?

You've made numerous claims. This thread is a giant repository of your claims.

Dude, I laid out your Ad Hoc attack. You cited my ' failed military expertise' as the only reason for dismissing Genesis as fiction.

Another fantasy, as I've already explained when I responded to your ad hom claim.

Again you asked for biblical content I provide it.

I assume you're speaking of the timeline that does indeed exist in genesis, that you are uninterested in pursuing, and claim does not? You certainly haven't given any BCV for monkey men with souls, because it doesn't exist.

Then you shift the goal post by addressing a non biblical subject (the injection of science into The Genesis account,) and still demand BCV. That my friend is another text book example of shifting the goal posts.

You're the one talking about monkey men with souls, heredity, and evolution...why is it that you think I "injected" anything? Did you not understand what you were doing when you decided to tell us this extra-biblical fairytale?

Vice versa meaning you believe an arguement is False because it has not been proven true.

No, I've never even gone into why I can conclude, with certainty, that the narrative is fiction. I don't have you. You claim that it actually happened. Make it so.

Your explanation is extraneous from the biblical point of view anyway, they didn't leave any evidence because :bullshit mode engaged: "god made their clothes magical and fed them with -manna-, as the bible tells us" /asshattery.

Again my 'explaination' simply says there is no time line between the end of creation and the fall of man.

Whoah there buddy...are you going to pretend that you're responding to the quoted section, or that you didn't prattle about the absence of evidence in exodus? There is a timeline, it is within the narrative, and I've already explained how you could calc it. So that's a bold faced lie nestled within a shifty quote dodge.

The quote you chose, was an example of -my apologetics-...just as a comparison to your own "um..eeww...that's tough, uh, maybe they ate the evidence" bullshit. Nut up and get some jesus heretic! There is no evidence because god put miracle juice in their stuff - says it right there in the book - that you probably don't know very well at all........too busy chasing the god in your head, and -his- explanations. So much for your claim to providing biblical answers. Guess if biblical answers is what somebody wants...they'll have to ask me, huh?

Because of this ALL of Evolution as stated by your god 'science' can fit in that time span no matter what 'science' wants to say.

Afraid not, unless the genesis narrative is fiction (and, amusingly...even if it isn't). You know I don't believe in gods, now you're just grasping.

That my friend is indeed supported biblically. Everything else is just conjecture detailing how it might have all gone down. But, bottom line the part you can't admit to the part you and your buddies will not discuss... Is the biblically supported part that assimilates the whole fossil record into the creation account.

Here I am, willing to allow you to assert the reality of the genesis account in order to get a timeline..because it would be so easy, but you aren't interested. You want to make the claim, but you're uncomfortable where the claim may lead. I understand.

Are you in denial? In the last post I gave you your BCV why haven't yoou responded to it?

You might want to read my responses nubcakes. I offered you, based on what you quoted...a timeline. The timeline has to be accurate, because the genesis narrative has to be accurate...don't you think?