RE: Indiana's Govenor Signs 'Religious Freedom' Bill
April 3, 2015 at 3:09 pm
(This post was last modified: April 3, 2015 at 3:10 pm by Polaris.)
I do tend to agree with the overall legalistic aim of the law (from what I have heard, the government of Indiana did not want to have people getting sued over their religious faith....as in, a Moslem can choose not to serve pork but can't deny someone service), but agree that they should have provided better details in the law to prevent it from being abused (aka a way to discriminate...not sure if that bakery sign was meant as a parody, but not sure they could even get away with it under the new law). It almost seemed like a "leave the government of Indiana out of your petty squabbles...you're wasting our time".
In America, the art of suing has become a new favorite pastime and it's become ridiculous not just related to this particular issue....there was even an incident when a crook won a lawsuit because someone did not have food in their home when he robbed them.
In America, the art of suing has become a new favorite pastime and it's become ridiculous not just related to this particular issue....there was even an incident when a crook won a lawsuit because someone did not have food in their home when he robbed them.
But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, His Son, purifies us from all sin.