(April 3, 2015 at 4:13 pm)Heywood Wrote: When the gay customer can easily find another baker willing to bake a cake for their gay wedding, the state has no compelling interest. This is a case of progressives simply trying to force other people to behave in a way they want them to behave for no good reason other than that is their desire.
But you can't find someone else to bake your cake for your gay wedding when the wedding is tomorrow and the baker said, "Oh, this is a gay wedding? Well, fuck that. My religious convictions won't allow me. My religious freedom allows me to renege on the contract."
Do you seriously think gay people want to force Christian bigots to bake their cakes for their weddings? You really want to go out of your way to have someone who hates you and force them to make your food for your special occasion? I know you're a Christian but try to think logically. The issue comes up because you've already contracted the professionals, you didn't know they were bigots and they want to use their "religious freedom" to back out at the 11th hour when it's too late to just get someone else.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
