RE: Indiana's Govenor Signs 'Religious Freedom' Bill
April 4, 2015 at 2:16 pm
(This post was last modified: April 4, 2015 at 2:21 pm by Heywood.)
(April 4, 2015 at 12:07 am)Brakeman Wrote: Yeah Cato!, Da gays can buy their cakes & pizzas elsewhere, haven't you heard of "Separate but Equal?"
Separate but Equal referred to governmental facilities and services.....not the market. It doesn't even apply here and you bringing it up suggest your don't know what you are talking about. Gays are served by substantially the same market as straights. Again this isn't about correcting some social injustice. This is about progressotards trying to control people.
(April 4, 2015 at 5:29 am)DeistPaladin Wrote:(April 3, 2015 at 9:20 pm)Heywood Wrote: What prompted this legislation is bakers and photographers being sued for refusing to service gay weddings. I bet that in those cases, once the couple found out the business did not want to service them, they didn't want the business to service them either......but why then would they go on to sue those businesses? Because they wanted to force their morality upon them. They wanted a civil rights trophy at the expense of destroying individual freedom."You bet" huh?
Have you ever been married?
Yes I have been married. I agree with your point that nobody wants a baker or photographer who doesn't want to do they job. So I ask you, why force them when you can easily find one who can do the job? You know the answer to that question...you force them so that they will behave the way you want them to behave. You want to enslave people and that is evil.
(April 4, 2015 at 5:33 am)robvalue Wrote: Like has been said, if you don't plan to offer a service free from discrimination, then don't go into business in the first place.
This is stupid. It is like saying that the problem goes away if gays are simply prohibited from getting married.
