(April 5, 2015 at 2:02 am)Heywood Wrote:(April 4, 2015 at 10:31 pm)Desert Diva Wrote: Considering that this has already manifested itself in a pediatrician refusing to treat the child of two lesbians, I think we are going down that slippery slope like it has been coated with goose grease. Fuck every single person who thinks this is okay. With a rusty spork.
What is the big deal? Another doctor at the clinic was more than happy to see the child. There is no evidence to suggest this baby was denied healthcare because of her parents sexual orientation. Why then is it necessary in your mind that this doctor be forced to do something she doesn't want to do?
(April 4, 2015 at 4:07 pm)Chas Wrote: The law is not limited to bakers and photographers, so your disingenuous attempt to minimize the potential for damage is contemptible.
Disingenuous is claiming this law was implemented so people can back out of weddings at the last moment. The truth is this law is push back against states action to force people to do things they don't need to do(either for their own good or the good of others) or want to do.
Here's your rusty spork. Have at it.
...it is common knowledge that the upper third, centered in Flagstaff, is Alta Arizona; the lower third, centered in Tucson, is Baja Arizona; and the middle third, centered in Phoenix, is Caca Arizona. Simple as ABC...
http://www.bandersnatch.com/bajaz.htm
http://www.bandersnatch.com/bajaz.htm
