RE: Supreme Court Same Sex Marriage Argumet
August 4, 2015 at 9:33 am
(This post was last modified: August 4, 2015 at 10:08 am by Ace.)
(August 4, 2015 at 9:10 am)Redbeard The Pink Wrote:(August 4, 2015 at 9:00 am)Ace Wrote:
WOO HOOOO . . .YES, YES THANK YOU. FINALLY THE TRUTH.
Umm hahah how is that civilised???!!!
The people do know what it is like because you are taking away their rights. And like anyone, even you, want their rights, (in their case back).
The homosexual community has done a Coup d'état of the western world.
Oh so you can and are are taking the rights from one group to give to another! So You can treat one group of Americans lower or different from each other by giving one rights to one group and taking away rights of another! Thus, you are not at all for not for a democratic nation of the rule of the people, equality or equal rights but, for elitism and oligarchy.
Also you do know that if you conspire against the government ,Under the law you are considered a traitor and a seditionest.
United States Code at 18 U.S.C. § 2381 states "whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
Congress has, at times, passed statutes creating related offenses that punish conduct which undermines the government or the national security, such as sedition in the 1798 Alien and Sedition Acts, or espionage and sedition in the 1917 Espionage Act, which do not require the testimony of two witnesses and have a much broader definition than Article Three treason
Ace, you are a level of stupid I can barely begin to describe. The extent to which you have missed the point is embarrassing to me as a human.
Nobody has a right to oppress others. You can't take away a right that does not exist. If a person thinks they DO have the right to oppress someone, then that person is a bigot. Being a bigot does not give someone special rights to oppress the rights of others.
Also it looks like you got the wrong post I did put up a new one because I did miss up the post you have quoted.
Also I thought a bigot was any one who opposes homosexuality? Now you are saying a person who oppress another is a bigot also? Hmm don't we call one who oppresses an oppressor?
