RE: atheism and children
August 7, 2015 at 5:50 pm
(This post was last modified: August 7, 2015 at 6:20 pm by Catholic_Lady.)
(August 7, 2015 at 3:48 am)Pandæmonium Wrote:(August 6, 2015 at 3:01 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: It's not the end result that we think is immoral, it's the act itself.
If you need $10 you can either attain it by stealing, or by shoveling snow off your neighbor's driveway. The end result is the same... you got $10.
Likewise, it's not having a kid that we think is immoral (obviously lol), it's the means by which you went about it.
That is the most ridiculous analogy I've ever read regarding an objection to IVF.
If you disagree with the means, fair enough. However, to date, you have failed consistently to provide a valid or even comprehensible reason to this general membership as to why you hold this objection. "Because reasons" is all I can deduce at the moment.
I can only conclude back to my original conclusions regarding the knee-jerk to 'It's sinful (or whatever)' when confronted with an ambiguity following on from technological advance.
That may be because it wasn't an analogy to show an objection to IVF, per se. You have to remember where that analogy originated from. Someone said they don't understand what the problem is with IVF if the end result is the same as having sex (...that you get a kid).
My analogy was simply to show that there can be a right and wrong way of going about the same end result.
That's all that was.
I have several times now given my reasons as for why I think IVF is wrong, so I don't think it's fair for you to say that I have not. I will try to look for one of them and repost it.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh