(August 10, 2015 at 10:18 am)Clueless Morgan Wrote:(August 7, 2015 at 6:10 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: We think something as sacred as human life should come from a place that is equally as sacred - the lovemaking between husband and wife, where a human being can come into this world through love, literally.
You're saying human life should come from a loving sexual act, so what does that say about a human life conceived during a violent one?
You can "should" all you want, but the fact of the matter is that some percentage of human life will be conceived through a sex act that is completely devoid of any "sacredness" or notion of "lovemaking" - even when the sex act is taking place between a husband and a wife. Marital rape is a thing.
I know you have tried to disassociate the act of conception from the worth of the person conceived, but you cannot deny that the sentiment that you are expressing here strongly implies that human lives that are conceived though anything other than your definition of "sacred lovemaking" are lesser and that is bullshit.
To answer your question, it says nothing about the human life. Only about the act itself. In this case, I suppose it would be rape. Yes, rape is immoral, but any innocent human life that is conceived through rape is just as sacred and precious as any other life. How a person was conceived has no bearing on that person whatsoever.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh