What the bible says Hell is like

[GUBU]

Wow.  You really believe this bullshit, don't you? Astounding. And I ask for facts, and you give me more yammering word-salad fantasy.  No, everyone does NOT believe. And there is no god apparent in nature, and most certainly not apparent in that evil book.

Actually, the 66 books of the Old and New Testaments is God's revelation; it is thus verbally inspired and completely without error (historically, scientifically (not a science manual however and is worded to be relevant across millenniums), morally, and spiritually) in its original writings - along the way it recorded man's sin ('evil' is some sense is defined as 'sin'). Scripture reveals the being, nature, and character of God, the nature of God's creation, and especially His will for the salvation of human beings through Jesus Christ; after all, the primary purpose of the universe is redemption of which only humans can partake. The big bang event would be nothing but chaos and randomness if it didn't have a purpose. The four fundamental physical forces were perfectly integrated and the physical laws were pre-established to govern them.

This is by no means an exhaustive list, as I'm simply picking off the top of my head.

Historical errors in the bible:

1) The first creation myth. The universe wasn't created c 6,000 years ago by god shouting for a light.
2) The second creation myth. Humanity wasn't created ex nihilo.
3) The exodus. We have no evidence for either mass slavery building the pyramids (most workers were either paid craftspeople or temporary draftees) nor for any judaic presence in Egypt (well prior to the Hellenistic period anyways)
4) The "invasion" of Canaan. The jews were a minor group of the semitic Canaanite people who eventually grew to be the most dominant tribe.
5) The united kingdom of Judah/Israel. No archeological evidence for such a kingdom exists and the periods where the bible says it existed the whole area was under Egyptian, Lydian, Assyrian or Babylonian control.
6) The "census". First of all censuses didn't happen like as described (they still don't, a census is a snapshot of people where they live right now, not where their purported ancestors lived 20 generations ago). Second of all Iudea still wasn't part of Rome proper during the timeframe given, it was a protectorate. Third of all the dramatis personae given for the Iduean and Roman sides weren't in place when Yeshua was supposedly born, thus leading to biblical "scholars" torturing the timeline to make it fit.
7) The crucifixion. The Roman state used crucifixion for traitors against itself (such as Spartacus), reserving the worst punishment for the worst perceived threats, not minor heretics of a religion of a subject people who were found guilty under the religious laws of the subject people. The jews didn't use crucifixion, preferring stoning or lynching.


Scientific errors in the bible:

1) Both creation myths, they are both at variance with each other, and get nothing right about how the universe started, how the solar system started, how the world is shaped nor how the current biodiversity came to be.
2) The flood. This story is so scientifically wrong that I can safely assert that you have more chance of seeing me morph into the USS Enterprise ("no bloody, A, B, C or D!") than the global forty day flood having happened.
3) Jonah surviving being et by a whale. How's he going to survive the acid melting his flesh and bones, and the lack of a breathable atmosphere?
4) The raisings of the dead. Both old and new testaments tell such stories. Now there is a plausible explanation for these, in that medical knowledge was so bad at the time that people may have appeared to be dead when they weren't and somebody with slightly better knowledge took advantage of this to proclaim a miracle when the not dead "corpses" were revived. So we may have a string of confidence tricksters.
5) The other miracles. These are simply implausible and unrepeatable assertions at third hand remove from the supposed events. These accounts are so scientifically invalid that anything that gets into the bible that is scientifically correct can be dismissed as coincidence.

Interesting to note that you don't talk about the bible being geographically correct. Maybe you accept that the new testament was written by a bunch of people who didn't know the land they were writing about, and that the old testament was a bunch of legends for which geography was vastly unimportant.

Moral problems with the bible:

1) God drowned the world because the people he created didn't live up to his demands, despite him creating them in such a way they wouldn't.
2) God condemning consensual gay sex, and gay rape. Yet in the same breath god says it is ok to rape and then murder two women.
3) God forcing a man to kill his only son and heir for his personal amusement.
4) God demanding that all the people of a rival tribe being slaughtered apart from the prepubescent girls who were to be given a life of sexual slavery and daily rape.
5) God hatching a plan to kill all the men of another tribe, who were willing to subsume their culture and beliefs into those of "god's chosen people" as a peace offering. This peace offering is despite the fact that the rival tribe is the wronged party, as the jews had kidnapped their women to subject them to, you've guessed it, a life of sexual slavery and daily rape.
6) Turing a woman into a pillar of salt just for looking at the dazzling light show that god put on.

It has been calculated that in the bible satan has committed ten murders whereas god has committed at least two million. You have to ask yourself who is the more evil.

To conclude I'll give you a quote from another book:

I was walking along the bank of a stream when I saw a mother otter with her cubs, a very endearing sight, I'm sure you'll agree. And even as I watched, the mother otter dived into the water and came up with a plump salmon, which she subdued and dragged onto a half submerged log. As she ate it, while of course it was still alive, the body split and I remember to this day the sweet pinkness of its roes as they spilled out, much to the delight of the baby otters, who scrambled over themselves to feed on the delicacy. One of nature's wonders, gentlemen. Mother and children dining upon mother and children. And that is when I first learned about evil. It is built into the very nature of the universe. Every world spins in pain. If there is any kind of supreme being, I told myself, it is up to all of us to become his moral superior.