(October 11, 2015 at 1:04 pm)Randys brother Wrote:(October 11, 2015 at 12:59 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: @Randys brother (or as I'll hereafter refer to you, Poe): Your "evidence" for the untrustworthiness of radiocarbon dating is an amateurish cartoon clip in which radiocarbon dating is not mentioned once?!? As for the actual content of the video, why don't you do a little research? I'm sure, if you're honest, you'll soon enough discover the Mack truck-size holes in the presentation.
And if you're not honest about it, you will only (1) confirm my dim view of what passes for Christian honesty, or (2) confirm to me that you are a Poe.
I don't trust carbon dating,and that's there might be evidence for it,but I assume there still too weak and so I totally reject the idea.
(October 11, 2015 at 1:03 pm)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: Yeah, I have to agree with you on that. When I see someone posting stuff that's that blatantly dishonest about the subject, I can no longer take them seriously enough to waste my time interacting with them.Your the real liar,didn't you lie before?
1. Liar
2. Poe
3. Accepts that the USGS is not insane, and that there's a rational basis for radioisometric dating.
I also agree that if the dating methods were used to confirm that a piece of wood was Jesus's cross (or somesuch), they'd be all about it.
Did you miss where I admitted my mistake, and said I was wrong about Patheos, or do you think that a mistake makes me a liar?
In fact, it's your inability to FIX YOUR MISTAKES when they're pointed out to you that makes me call you a liar, here.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
