RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
February 18, 2016 at 1:16 am
(This post was last modified: February 18, 2016 at 1:23 am by God of Mr. Hanky.)
(February 18, 2016 at 12:58 am)AAA Wrote: I would just insult me too if I didn't have a good response. Notice how I am the one trying to discuss biological topics, while you are just mocking.
I mock and insult you because it's gratifying, and because your arguments deserve no respect when they are argued from nothing more substantial than your ignorance.
Here, if you can handle it, and of course every word you post clarifies the fact that you can't,
is something for you to chew on: What isn't likely may still be true, but the unlikely remains not worth considering just because so many crybabies for Christ stamp their feet, bawl, and throw shit all over the biology classrooms in an attempt at forcing somebody there to agree with them. Conversely, what is likely remains likely whether or not you understand how it could have happened.
BONUS:
Not that anybody here purports the hypothesis of abiogenesis as fact. The rest is covered by a theory which explains the facts which are undeniable by anybody under the flag of science.
Mr. Hanky loves you!