RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
February 18, 2016 at 3:47 pm
(This post was last modified: February 18, 2016 at 3:53 pm by FebruaryOfReason.)
(February 18, 2016 at 3:45 pm)AAA Wrote:(February 18, 2016 at 3:35 pm)God of Mr. Hanky Wrote: Well of course it's just hopelessly speculative, because without any data it just isn't possible! Well at least the speculations of actual scientists don't write their own biased laws of physics and chemistry. The sum of all the statements which you have made here imply only one thing clearly, which is that you love nothing more than not knowing. If you had a good answer, that us one with a good and thorough explanation, then this would render your mysterious God useless, and you really, really don't want to do that, do you? Admit it, you're frightened of us!I'm not the one running from science. I bring in scientific phenomena every response, while you just put words in my mouth and act as though you are so high and mighty, yet you have said nothing to demonstrate that you've graduated from high school. And your speculations go against what we see with how these molecules are formed, so that's why I don't like them. I never said I had a thorough explanation for how it happened, just that your explanation is wrong.
Oh, Lawd, please save us from that big, bad evil-lootionist! Oh....why won't he just leave us alone and let us go back to being the humble and ignorant barbarians which we were the first time you led us to sack and burn the cities of the scientists?
Please see my previous post, AAA. I did graduate from High School.
In fact, I went on to graduate from University. In chemistry.
I know how these molecules are formed. I don't need to speculate. I don't simply believe what I was told by my tutors. I verified what they told me in the laboratory.
I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty.