What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?

[AAA]

I just read through all 8 pages of this.  Why do I feel like I just sat through a Sunday morning sermon!

AAA, you are entitled to your own beliefs. As a loyal religious person it is your job to defend the faith.
Having said that, it doesn't matter what discipline you study: biology, physics, robotics, etc.

You will use any knowledge you learn in your field and skew it to fit your comic book. (jesus gives you kudos when you do)
In this case its biology. You are breaking the first rule of science. Skewing the evidence to suit your outcome. That's a big naughty, naughty, no, no.

(At least I hope you're doing that! For your sake! You'll burn in hell if you're not defending Jesus!)

Just to add.
You believed in God way before you started studying biology. You had no proof then, why all of a sudden do you feel compelled to need proof all of a sudden.
Are you trying to convince yourself or us.
Since you've already decided on the outcome, you'll happily argue your case with all other disciplines as well. eg: cosmological fine tuning? Sorry, when did you become Carl Sagan?
Alex? get the program man! This guy knows his shit better than you!

I'm not skewing evidence though? Do you have an example of when I lied about evidence? maybe I have a different interpretation, but that is allowed and should be encouraged in science.