Evidence for atheist claims

[Mister Agenda]

Judging by your near-complete misunderstanding of my post, I doubt thinking is your strong point.

All your post say is that there are a myriad of atheists with different ideas so I shouldn't generalize
and that atheism simply means a lack of belief in God.
Right?
Well well Mister here we got a big problem with your judgment.  

I do judge according what I see or hear not according what a particular term suppose to mean.
As far as the atheists on this forum keep on spouting dogma after dogma I judge talking in consideration
these dogmas.
Nothing more nothing less.  

And my post pointed out that this forum isn't remotely representative of all atheists, which you completely ignored, because that's really inconvenient for your claim and you wouldn't know intellectual honesty if it bit you. Only an idiot generalizes from what they see and hear when they know what they see and hear isn't representative. It's like going to a yoga studio in Texas and judging Americans by what you see and hear there.

A dogma is a principle or set of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true. Atheists don't have one of those. What you are calling 'multiple dogmas' are known to the rest of humanity as 'opinions'. What the majority of atheist members on this board have in common in the way of opinions is called 'consensus'. Consensus is arrived at by persuading people that your opinions are correct, hopefully (if you value such things) with evidence and sweet reason. 'Opinion' and 'consensus' are not synonyms for 'dogma'.

Your judgment is an opinion, and in your case, extremely poorly supported.