RE: Evidence for atheist claims
June 6, 2016 at 2:07 pm
(This post was last modified: June 6, 2016 at 2:10 pm by Angrboda.)
(June 6, 2016 at 9:51 am)Little Rik Wrote:(June 5, 2016 at 2:13 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: The same person arguing that the original meaning is best (you) is arguing for a change in the meaning of the term atheist (you). That's what's inconsistent. It's not some anonymous third 'someone'. It's all you.
Duh. Moron.
Silly.
Your difficulty in comprehend the meaning of the sentences is getting worse by the day.
By saying that I ...........have no choice but to rebut and challenge that idea.........doesn't mean that I
change the meaning of the original meaning.
It only means that I do challenge those who try to change the original meaning of the word which is 100% in line with my belief that the original meaning should be left alone.
Capish?
You are massively confused. I wasn't talking about that sentence. I was referring to your trying to tack on a bunch of 'dogma' propositions onto the meaning of the term atheist. That was all you.
Now that you're done stalling, everyone but you can see what a hypocrite you are.