(June 30, 2016 at 9:03 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:(June 30, 2016 at 8:09 pm)Aractus Wrote: As I mentioned before though, those examples don't advance Bart's argument that the original wording is "un-knowable".
I'm not familiar with all of Ehrman's work, but I have never encountered such an argument in the stuff that I have read. Since you haven't read Ehrman's work, I can only presume you are referring to videos in which he's made this argument. Can you link to such a video or other media in which Ehrman is making the argument you claim he is making?
fyi, Bart Ehrman was also employed by The Teacher Company TTC to produce several series of University style audio lectures on the History of Christianity (MP3). I am lucky enough to have come up the entire collection. I should try to make this available to my Atheist friends somehow. The more people learn about Christian History, the more they reject it.
