RE: If free will was not real
August 18, 2016 at 1:34 am
(This post was last modified: August 18, 2016 at 1:35 am by Edwardo Piet.)
See, not an argument.
You're simply defining "free choice" as "choice" or IOW "free will" as "will".
The question is not whether we have a choice, but whether our choices are free.
You're assuming your conclusion within your premise!
I find it rather amusing that you're an anti-theist but your debate 'skills' are theistic
ETA: You're basically saying "choices are free because of course we have a choice!"
That. Is. Not. An. Argument.
You're simply defining "free choice" as "choice" or IOW "free will" as "will".
The question is not whether we have a choice, but whether our choices are free.
You're assuming your conclusion within your premise!
I find it rather amusing that you're an anti-theist but your debate 'skills' are theistic
ETA: You're basically saying "choices are free because of course we have a choice!"
That. Is. Not. An. Argument.