What would evidence of a God even look like?

[Angrboda]

The classical answer is the expansion of space-time.  What is your answer?

My theological answer is a "self expression" by the extant God but the scientific answer "quantum fluctuation" works just as well.  But neither fully answers "how"?

My answer comes from quantizing the infinite spacial relationships the IUS has with it's own substance, into finite representation. This is not word salad, this is the discrete meaning of "quantum": the minimum single action or measurement of an infinite.

Well, first off, your use of the phrase 'infinite' slipped past me. Even if the original universe had no center and was omnipresent in space-time, that doesn't make it infinite in comparison to current time spatial metrics. So no, infinity is not one of its attributes. Moreover, it seems plausible that an actual infinity cannot exist, so this infinitude of the early universe must only be conceptual.

Second, that's not the definition of quantum. Loosely speaking, quantum result from quantizing the finite, that the finite is organized into discrete quanta that are indivisible. It does sound like word salad to me, but please continue.

The substance of the IUS exists in 3 equal relationships: All around itself equally in all directions, at the center of itself everywhere and as a field in tension equilibrium. This quantizes into a sphere, a point of real substance (not a place holder point) in the center of the sphere, and a tetrahedron (minimum geometric tensor of 3d space) between them.

Why would it quantize into essentially two space objects and a tetrahedron? This step doesn't seem to follow from mere quantization of the plenury that was the early universe. How is this a better prediction of the early universe than standard inflationary cosmology?

If a God being expressed itself, those are the only spatial relationships to be expressed..... if the IUS just up and one day quantum fluctuated, those are the only spacial relationships to be expressed.

If I follow you, you're suggesting that this hypothetical evolution of the early universe is identical to that which would be the product of a god being expressing itself. I fail to see where you get that this is the necessary consequence of a god expressing itself. Feel free to continue anyway. I'll do my best to make sense of it.

Follow so far?

Vaguely. I'll know better from your next step.