Evolution in action.

[Angrboda]

From an accusation of fraud to an insinuation of sampling bias.  Those are some pretty agile goalposts.

I don't think that it is that controversial, that the moths in the photo where dead and glued in place for the picture.... and it would seem that the issue is still assumptions based on limited data in either case.

... the photos played no part in the scientific research or its conclusions.

http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB601_1.html

What exactly is your point here? That science is complex? You'll dance around any way you can to avoid the obvious conclusion that differential selective pressures on peppered moths resulted in a change of allele frequency in the species. That conclusion is indisputable. You're just bringing up irrelevancies to cloud the issue.