RE: Supernatural Evidence?
October 17, 2016 at 9:58 pm
(This post was last modified: October 17, 2016 at 9:59 pm by cactus.)
(October 17, 2016 at 9:33 pm)Arkilogue Wrote:(October 17, 2016 at 9:25 pm)cactus Wrote: No. Something can be natural even if it's perpetually beyond our comprehension.
But it would probably be labeled as super-natural before, yes? As in indicating a real phenomenon but dressed up in superstitious terms.
I typically reserve the word supernatural for "x of the gaps" situations, where the people making the claims continue to shift the goalposts in order to stay outside the reach of science.
If we came from dust, then why is there still dust?
