RE: Supernatural Evidence?
October 18, 2016 at 6:33 pm
(This post was last modified: October 18, 2016 at 6:39 pm by Simon Moon.)
(October 18, 2016 at 2:25 pm)Soldat Du Christ Wrote: Proposition 1. Job 38:16
"Hast thou entered into the springs of the sea? or hast thou walked in the search of the depth?
"
Discovered 1977
http://www.waterencyclopedia.com/Ge-Hy/H...Floor.html
NOTICE: Lateral moves, ad hominums, and other evasions will not be noticed. Adress the evidence, and only the evidence presented.
Sorry, but post hoc reinterpretations of Bible passages to try to shoehorn them to fit modern discoveries , are pretty weak arguments at best.
You do know that the Muslims do the exact same thing with the Koran, right? Just google "scientific discoveries koran" or something similar. And their examples of the same thing you are doing are just as 'impressive', meaning, not at all.
I'll bet you don't give their examples any credence. Special pleading is another fallacy you missed in your list.
Quote:Don't worry there are plenty more where that came from, one at a time.
The plural of "bad evidence" does not equal good evidence. It's just a bigger load of crap evidence.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
