RE: Supernatural Evidence?
October 20, 2016 at 8:38 pm
(This post was last modified: October 20, 2016 at 8:39 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
(October 17, 2016 at 8:49 pm)Soldat Du Christ Wrote: Alright self-proclaimed athiests
It's an accurate label for what I don't believe in.
Quote:,
FUCK you and your comma!
Quote: this is where your integrity is put into question.
Nope.
Quote:As some of you will so valiantly declair nuetrality,
I am aifrad yuor spilelng mtseiaks are siwonhg.
Quote:the default position being a lack of belief in god,
Absence. There is nothing lacking or deficient in not believing in utter shite.
Sorry but this "lack of belief" thing is one of my pet peeves. It's an absence, not a lack.
Quote: rather than being closed off to the possibility.
I'm not. But logical possibility =/= logical soundness.
Quote:Taking that stance will leave you inlcined [your typos are showing] to be open to the supernatural, as the very idea of God implies supernatural. This isn't a 'GOTCHA' question, i have a following proposition.
So, are you open to supernatural evidence?
If and only if supernatural evidence can somehow be falsifiable. I don't see how that's the case. Supernatural evidence seems unfalsifiable and therefore lacking (not merely absent) by definition.