RE: Supernatural Evidence?
October 30, 2016 at 6:36 am
(This post was last modified: October 30, 2016 at 6:46 am by GUBU.)
(October 17, 2016 at 9:41 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:(October 17, 2016 at 8:49 pm)Soldat Du Christ Wrote: Alright self-proclaimed athiests, this is where your integrity is put into question. As some of you will so valiantly declair nuetrality, the default position being a lack of belief in god, rather than being closed off to the possibility.
Taking that stance will leave you inlcined to be open to the supernatural, as the very idea of God implies supernatural. This isn't a 'GOTCHA' question, i have a following proposition.
So, are you open to supernatural evidence?
From long experience the thread will quickly turn to semantics. The argument will be that everything previously thought supernatural later got rolled into natural. Blah blah blah. When in fact the opposite happened. We expanded the definition of natural to encompass previously dismissed phenomena.
Wooters, you'd have a valid argument, if every single word you posted was not a complete and utter denial of fact. Do you think we should accept thunder as god caused despite knowing the natural pocesses that cause it? Gravity? Crop growth? Smelting? Solar system creation?
These are all things that have a stamp of the divine in the bible, yet which we have figured out totally natural causes for.
It's shit like this which leaves you with no respect on this forum.
(October 18, 2016 at 2:25 pm)Soldat Du Christ Wrote: Proposition 1. Job 38:16
"Hast thou entered into the springs of the sea? or hast thou walked in the search of the depth?
"
Discovered 1977
http://www.waterencyclopedia.com/Ge-Hy/H...Floor.html
NOTICE: Lateral moves, ad hominums, and other evasions will not be noticed. Adress the evidence, and only the evidence presented.
The only thing you've proven is that people have been free diving for thousands of years, they knew the sea was "deep" but couldn't say how deep
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Home