Supernatural Evidence?

[Huggy Bear]

That's not how science works. Unless it is a refutation, which what you posted wasn't, then it adds to the body of evidence and the theory becomes more nuanced over time.

You are ignoring what I said earlier about your binary religious thinking. You can not draw a strict line between male and female brains, the two classes are distinct but share many features. For example men are generally strong and taller than women, but some men are shorter than some women, and some men are weaker than some women. Some men are shorter than some women but also stronger. But in each case they still have enough characteristics to be deemed men. This is why you cannot say that any brain, whether cisgendered or transgendered is 100% male or female.

No love, that is exactly how science works. You see in your desperation to find an article that agrees with your point, you failed to realize your article quotes the exact same guy I did, Antonio Guillamon; except your article is much older than mine, therefore if there is any discrepancy then the older information is obsolete.

He didn't say that the previous findings were wrong though. Regardless of the date, why are you still ignoring the bit I have put into bold which explains it all?

He wasn't asked about previous findings, so why would he just randomly bring it up? Also the part you emboldened is just YOU grasping at straws, You explicitly stated that:

Science shows that transsexual brains are more similar to the gender that they claim to be and that they are not deluded in the same way.

*emphasis mine*

This is false according to Antonio Guillamon a source both YOU and I referenced.


https://www.scientificamerican.com/artic...der-brain/

“Trans people have brains that are different from males and females, a unique kind of brain,”

It clearly states that trans people have DIFFERENT brains, not similar...

And for your information, I am a professional scientist. I know how science works.

Apparently not if you don't realize that scientific data is based upon the best available information and is subject to becoming obsolete in light of new data.

Mind providing a reference?

That sentence is meaningless.

Hold up! Why is asking you to provide a citation with your claim meaningless?

It's ok, just take the L, no shame in that.

There is a reason that members like The Gentleman Bastard, prefer to heckle from the sideline, rather than get involved in the debate, they want no part of being in Huggy's highlight reel...