RE: Supernatural Evidence?
November 8, 2016 at 2:04 pm
(This post was last modified: November 8, 2016 at 2:05 pm by brewer.)
(November 8, 2016 at 12:15 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: [edit]Repost of the link: http://www.quackwatch.org/11Ind/sebi.html
I thought that was the link you were referring to, don't you find it the least bit strange that this website is calling him a quack just after he dies and can't defend himself?
[edit]
Regarding the quackwatch link: You do understand what "revised means" or is there a reading comprehension issue? Look at the bottom of the page. This guy has been on the quackwatch radar for years. Why didn't he (or anyone) defend himself then? Quackwatch allows people to post opposing views.
Take a look here: http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRela...s1987.html
Note that the post is from 2003.
Lame assertion.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.