(December 23, 2016 at 3:14 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote:(December 23, 2016 at 3:11 pm)AAA Wrote: Why not? What do you think about cells?
Pitiful little things, but so convoluted, inefficient, tenuous and ass backwards in so many of their vital operations their designer must be so dumb that random chance could easily have done a better job.
Are you serious? What part about them is inefficient? Is it the way that one gene can code bidirectionally, be differentially edited/spliced, and be recycled and used as micro RNAs to regulate translation? The prediction that cells should be severely flawed because their "designer" is random chance has been one of the least scientifically productive predictions of all time.