RE: Jesus did not rise from the dead -- My debate opening statement.
January 3, 2017 at 3:28 pm
(This post was last modified: January 3, 2017 at 3:38 pm by 21stCenturyIconoclast.)
(January 3, 2017 at 2:46 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote:(January 3, 2017 at 2:43 pm)21stCenturyIconoclast Wrote:ANYONE SEE "DRICH" RUN PAST THEIR HOUSE REGARDING MY CHALLENGE ABOVE?
m
Dude, beating your chest over saying something nasty to Drich is the lowest of low-hanging fruits.
FatAndFaithless,
Uh, okay. Nonetheless, have you seen him around? I want to add him to my pseudo-christian collection of names on easily refuting his notion
that Jesus actually existed, okay?
While doing so, you just take your normal position of being a forum "sideline nibbler" where you DO NOT have anything to add
to the discussion at hand, other than to make nondescript insipid statements, okay? Thanks.
I am sure it was an oversight for you to not call Yahweh Child out upon the same notion in the "Abused by your priest" thread, on page 9, yes?
Kids like FatAndFaithless, ya got to love em, because as Atheists, they are using their training wheels at this time to someday become able to
actually enter the discussion with relative content. Therefore, like I do, you have cut them some slack.
n
(January 3, 2017 at 3:02 pm)Minimalist Wrote:(January 2, 2017 at 4:25 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: Well, yeah . . . they do.
But I'm willing to grant them the smallest measure of respect as historical documents, if only to encourage the chew toys to keep coming back.
The problem with ancient historical documents is that they tend to tell us far more about the times in which they were written than they do about the times they are supposed to be talking about.
So while any document is a "historical document" what it tells us is what later xtians in divergent sects tended to believe at the time they were written. They don't need a "historical" jesus for that.
Minimalist,
Huh? Pseudo-christians don't have to prove an historical Jesus that was Yahweh incarnate, or the son of Yahweh, which is the crown jewel and the impetus of their primitive Bronze and Iron Age cultist belief??????? Surely you jest?
I can understand why pseudo-christians try in vain to be insidiously anachronistic, but to give them a pass upon not proving their serial killing Jesus existed is blasphemy! LOL
m
m