(January 14, 2017 at 12:44 pm)Little Rik Wrote: When someone tell a lie he-she need to build up a story that support that lie.
And when that story is knocked down the liar need to build up a bigger story to save the face.
In doing this the building that the liar has created may well collapse and the more that building is big the more the damage will cause if collapse.
It's almost as if you're describing all of your previous posts.
Quote:My parodies are just a way to show how foolish is to believe that nobody create the universe and that the universe run by itself.Do you have a parody to show how foolish it is to believe that the universe had to be created, but the creator didn't?
After this is up to you to demonstrate that I am wrong if you can.
If you can not do so then you are still stuck with a building full of fantasies.
If I claim that god does not exist, can you demonstrate that I am wrong? Or does disproving a negative only count when you demand it?
If you can't account for god the way you account for the universe, it seems as if you're the one stuck in a building full of fantasies.
You didn't think of that, did you Rik?
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
-Stephen Jay Gould