(February 11, 2017 at 3:38 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:(February 10, 2017 at 7:30 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: Intentionality and moral imperatives are things that naturalism has not explained. You overstep by claiming naturalism "cannot" explain those things. As usual when you confront naturalism, you fall into a stereotypical argument from ignorance.
If all people look for are efficient and material causes, then that's all they will find.
How does one "look for" formal and final causes?