RE: By the sun and its morning. ( 2 ) And [by] the moon when it follows it
April 10, 2017 at 11:54 am
Is this yet the Muslim's version of trying to reach back in time and claim ignorant humans knew more than they really did? Because we have other Christians here using the "fine Tuning" crap to point to the bible.
Nothing in those verses demonstrate modern scientific MATH.
We get Christians quote the beliefs of Newton and Aquinas and?
The ancient Greeks coined the word "atom", so by that logic, since they are much older, we should all believe in their gods. But somehow and rightfully so, nobody does that. Because the language and context of the word as it was used back then did not mean "electron, proton/neutron", back then it merely meant "imagine the smallest thing you cant divide".
Arabs gave us algebra and we thank them for that, but none of that makes Allah real god.
This is retrofitting after the fact, nothing more. Reaching back in time to prop up an ambiguous quote is not evidence, it is reaching for nothing and pretending it is something.
Nothing in those verses demonstrate modern scientific MATH.
We get Christians quote the beliefs of Newton and Aquinas and?
The ancient Greeks coined the word "atom", so by that logic, since they are much older, we should all believe in their gods. But somehow and rightfully so, nobody does that. Because the language and context of the word as it was used back then did not mean "electron, proton/neutron", back then it merely meant "imagine the smallest thing you cant divide".
Arabs gave us algebra and we thank them for that, but none of that makes Allah real god.
This is retrofitting after the fact, nothing more. Reaching back in time to prop up an ambiguous quote is not evidence, it is reaching for nothing and pretending it is something.