Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 26, 2022, 10:58 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Its not so anti female as i thought it would be?
#1
Its not so anti female as i thought it would be?
Context to beating females

"Sulaiman bin Amr bin Al-Ahwas said:

“My father narrated to me that he witnessed the farewell Hajj with the Messenger of Allah. So he thanked and praised Allah and he reminded and gave admonition. He mentioned a story in his narration and he (the Prophet) said: “And indeed I order you to be good to the women, for they are but captives with you over whom you have no power than that, except if they come with manifest Fahishah (evil behavior). If they do that, then abandon their beds and beat them with a beating that is not harmful. And if they obey you then you have no cause against them. Indeed you have rights over your women, and your women have rights over you. As for your rights over your women, then they must not allow anyone whom you dislike to treat on your bedding (furniture), nor to admit anyone in your home that you dislike. And their rights over you are that you treat them well in clothing them and feeding them.”

"

GradeSahih (Darussalam)
Jami` at-Tirmidhi 1163

So i dont see the problem to correct someone if they act annoying or insanely rude?. But it says you should treat your captives or females with goodness since its the fullfilment of faith.

So yeah i was wrong, i dont see anything wrong with this. I mean the only people i think would object to it is beta males or degenerates. But just curious?

For example in context, most women who are in hell are because they are ungrateful to their husband not because they themself are bad. If they are good they essentially go to paradise from what i know
Reply
#2
RE: Its not so anti female as i thought it would be?
Sure, you can cherry pick parts of the Quran to try and support whatever view you want. It doesn't mean the violent parts disappear.



Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#3
RE: Its not so anti female as i thought it would be?
Don't feed the troll.
“Eternity is a terrible thought. I mean, where's it going to end?” 
― Tom StoppardRosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead
Reply
#4
RE: Its not so anti female as i thought it would be?
Fwoooosh!
Dying to live, living to die.
Reply
#5
RE: Its not so anti female as i thought it would be?
Nothing like waking up on vacation, sit on the porcelain throne, check the forum and find an obv sock to ban.

Its just shows how efficient we are.
Reply
#6
RE: Its not so anti female as i thought it would be?
(August 8, 2018 at 6:40 am)LastPoet Wrote: Nothing like waking up on vacation, sit on the porcelain throne, check the forum and find an obv sock to ban.

Its just shows how efficient we are.

No one bans them better than you.
Reply
#7
RE: Its not so anti female as i thought it would be?
. . . I feel sorry for the rest . . .
 The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it. 




Reply
#8
RE: Its not so anti female as i thought it would be?
ROFLOL

Online for 4 minutes 6 seconds. That has to be some kind of record!
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
Reply
#9
RE: Its not so anti female as i thought it would be?
(August 8, 2018 at 10:55 am)Fireball Wrote: ROFLOL

Online for 4 minutes 6 seconds. That has to be some kind of record!

No brag, just fact (Will Sonnet) but I've done one within a minute of their first post.
 The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it. 




Reply
#10
RE: Its not so anti female as i thought it would be?
(August 8, 2018 at 11:22 pm)vorlon13 Wrote:
(August 8, 2018 at 10:55 am)Fireball Wrote: ROFLOL

Online for 4 minutes 6 seconds. That has to be some kind of record!

No brag, just fact (Will Sonnet) but I've done one within a minute of their first post.

Yeah, but we’re talking banning, not whatever you did to them...

😉
Dying to live, living to die.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Female cops for the first time in Mecca WinterHold 50 2120 July 24, 2021 at 10:18 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  [Quranic Reflection]: By the sun and its morn WinterHold 56 4174 May 11, 2020 at 5:00 am
Last Post: Helios
  Has Anyone Come Across Any Evidence of Pre-Muhmamamd Mass Graves of Female Babies? ReptilianPeon 10 935 February 7, 2019 at 1:41 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  The story of the garden, and anti-immigration opinions WinterHold 5 592 June 26, 2018 at 5:36 am
Last Post: WinterHold
  Athists & Infidels - Grab Allah's offer before its too late yragnitup 39 3968 March 27, 2018 at 1:46 pm
Last Post: Jackalope
  By the sun and its morning. ( 2 ) And [by] the moon when it follows it WinterHold 45 3283 April 11, 2017 at 8:36 pm
Last Post: WinterHold
  And if it were not that the people would become one community WinterHold 8 1448 July 8, 2016 at 4:08 pm
Last Post: ReptilianPeon
  Pakistani Anti-Child Marriage Law ‘Anti-Islamic’ & ‘Blasphemous’ ReptilianPeon 21 3795 February 13, 2016 at 5:03 pm
Last Post: Nihilist Virus
  Islam and its History and Impact of Prophet Muhammad(PBUH) yukapuka 161 15056 January 12, 2016 at 6:44 pm
Last Post: ReptilianPeon
  Australia launches Anti-Islam Party mralstoner 37 7391 November 16, 2015 at 5:17 pm
Last Post: abaris



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)