(April 19, 2017 at 6:26 pm)Crunchy Wrote:(April 19, 2017 at 5:13 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: Right or wrong in relation to a human thought or action. Are you being purposefully obtuse?No, are you?
Thought or action concerning what? Are we talking about your thoughts on Geography? The action of swimming? No, when discussing morality, we are talking about what is good for people. If you can understand that, then you may understand the rest of the post.
Where the hell did geography come from?
I disagree, moral does not always = good. That's kind of why there is a term, immoral.
Yep, we can discuss what is considered good or bad, objective/subjective, swimming, if you want. Swimming can be good or not so good. You brought it up, go for it.
Good is a relative/subjective term. Again, if you believe and can support it, define "objectively good".
Answer the questions:
Can you please tell me unequivocally what is "objectively good"?
Now, if I provided a child only gummy bears and classic coke, according to you, I'm being moral, I'm fulfilling a need. If another provides nutritious food and purified water they are also being moral. Would you say that one has a different moral standing than the other?
Theft or stealing, is it objectively (always, in all cases, without question) morally wrong?
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
