(June 26, 2017 at 11:36 am)Tizheruk Wrote: Let me be clear here I'm a moral realist and I don't believe morality is subjective but I will no abide other positions being misrepresented .
The Op keeps comparing subjective apples and oranges . Morality even if it was subjective can't be compared to a like of fruit .
Divine command theory and divine nature theory are as arbitrary as fuck. You can't take action like charity say it's positive and what maximally great being approves of . That's just you taking your presumed moral beliefs and imposing them on god then defining it as positive and maximally good. Sorry simply saying he has this attribute and this attribute is this won't cut it.
But that doesn't stop people and that's my whole point.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.