downbeatplumb Wrote:
(11 minutes ago)
Khemikal Wrote:
No they wouldn't.
Why not, can't there be competing facts?
Quote:
If morality was objective it would be completely uniform.
Why?
Quote:
It isn't hence subjective.
How would that follow...even if any of the above were true?
The quote facility dosent work for some reason, anyhoo.
If morality was objective everyone would have the same morals. They don't so it isn't.
You may say ah but we could argue about it. But morality would be different than something we could argue about it would be like the a colour, a sense that we all share. It isn't. So subjective.
(11 minutes ago)
Khemikal Wrote:
No they wouldn't.
Why not, can't there be competing facts?
Quote:
If morality was objective it would be completely uniform.
Why?
Quote:
It isn't hence subjective.
How would that follow...even if any of the above were true?
The quote facility dosent work for some reason, anyhoo.
If morality was objective everyone would have the same morals. They don't so it isn't.
You may say ah but we could argue about it. But morality would be different than something we could argue about it would be like the a colour, a sense that we all share. It isn't. So subjective.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
