Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 28, 2024, 9:38 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Objective morality as a proper basic belief
RE: Objective morality as a proper basic belief
Little Henry Wrote:[quote=Mister Agenda]

Because we can't have the subjective opinion that it's important to condemn such acts?

It essentially means nothing. If OM does not exist, then you are just expressing your preference, just like 1 person expresses their preference for blondes over brunette or NFL over golf. You are not making a statement with an intent for it to be a fact are you? So who really cares.Or are you?

If you don't care what I'll do to you if I catch you at it, that's imprudent. Do you think being raped (or shot for raping someone) is essentially nothing? That sounds like a mere assertion that doesn't stand up to casual scrutiny.

Little Henry Wrote:[quote=Mister Agenda]
I subjectively feel more strongly about murder preferences than food preferences.

Who cares. If OM does not exist, then who cares if you like pizza or burgers or the other way around. Thats all it really means.

I care. By definition. And enough people agree with me to make your life very problematic if you go around raping people, so you should care too, if you care about your freedom and survival.

Little Henry Wrote:[quote=Mister Agenda]
Yes, my subjective morality obligates me to do so.

But if OM does not exist, it cannot be wrong. Just undesirable. 

The point of that distinction being what? There are good reasons not to allow rape, but if you don't agree with those reasons, that just illustrates the subjective nature of morality. Just calling it objective doesn't fix that. And there's the question of how do you prove your version of OM is the 'right' one? And if it were 'properly basic' we could have universal agreement on the basics instead of weak general agreement. Let's face it, if we're having a moral argument and you go with 'I'm right because my moral beliefs are properly basic', it's just a wordy way of saying 'I can't back up what I'm saying'.

Little Henry Wrote:[quote=Mister Agenda]
Yeah, the difference between those two things, that seems to be a tough one for Christians unless they have a God commanding them not to do it...which he doesn't, btw.

?????

??
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Objective morality as a proper basic belief - by Mister Agenda - June 26, 2017 at 3:48 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Possibly Proper Death Litany, aka ... Gawdzilla Sama 11 845 December 18, 2023 at 1:15 pm
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  Morality Kingpin 101 5772 May 31, 2023 at 6:48 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  How do I deal with the belief that maybe... Just maybe... God exists and I'm... Gentle_Idiot 75 6342 November 23, 2022 at 5:34 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  A Case for Inherent Morality JohnJubinsky 66 6440 June 22, 2021 at 10:35 am
Last Post: John 6IX Breezy
  Morality without God Superjock 102 8900 June 17, 2021 at 6:10 pm
Last Post: Ranjr
  Belief in God is a clinic Interaktive 55 5575 April 1, 2019 at 10:55 pm
Last Post: LostLocke
  Is atheism a belief? Agnostico 1023 81404 March 16, 2019 at 1:42 pm
Last Post: Catharsis
  Morality Agnostico 337 36963 January 30, 2019 at 6:00 pm
Last Post: vulcanlogician
  Do you know that homeopathy doesn't work, or do you just lack belief that it does? I_am_not_mafia 24 5228 August 25, 2018 at 4:34 am
Last Post: EgoDeath
  Why don't some people understand lack of belief? Der/die AtheistIn 125 22151 April 20, 2018 at 7:15 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)