Well the fact that he completely reversed what you were saying means he doesn't understand fuck-all about anything moral, or he's just trolling. I honestly don't fucking understand how, after reading all that, anyone could mistakenly come to the conclusion that you aren't using harm as the axiom. It's about the simplest, most explicit point you're making.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
