(July 17, 2017 at 2:02 pm)Khemikal Wrote:
Your post are showing signs of degression. Attacking the person, changing the subject, and trying to attack arguments I'm not making. This is not part of intelligent discussion.
There is a big difference, in claiming, that there is "some connection" between harm and morals, and claiming that they are the basis for it.Which is it, that you are claiming to be the axiom? I also notice a connection between humans and morality. And while we at it, can you confirm exactly what statement or premise, that you are claiming to be axiomatic? While your rhetoric and sophism game may be good (i assume that is the "game" you where referring to earlier), many words, is not a substitute for substance and logical thinking.
And if you don't want to have an intelligent conversation, and just want to shout down everything I say, without addressing it. Fine, I look towards some smarter atheist to reason with.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther