No Trans In The Military Says Trump

[Amarok]

Sigh at no point did I say it's not possible for young men to have ED.

Except that you said exactly that or at least that you didn't "buy it." So it's possible, but you don't believe it?

I don't buy the idea that men in there fighting prime can't get it up .

I  meant considering the sheer cost and or number of pills prescribed I have a hard time accepting that's all about treating ED . Kam made a similar point. So your accusation does not hold. Let alone is even close to comparing it to gender treatments which is a solution to a medically recognized state I might add.

I never said it was all about treating ED. You might want to re-check my original statement, which merely pointed out that ED drugs are not purely recreational. Furthermore, and for the second time, ED is a "medically recognized state," so by your own argument, it is as legitimate as transexuality, which I wouldn't argue.

You seem to think I'm arguing that being trans is not a medical state. I'm not making that argument at all. Again, I only stated that ED drugs are not purely recreational. Anything you argue outside of that statement is a waste of time.

I already elaborated this in my last post .Thou I admit the wording does not communicate it well in my original post. I should have said that I don't buy that that many young healthy men are suffering from ED as opposed to recreation . That's the point I dispute .

---

Except that you said exactly that or at least that you didn't "buy it." So it's possible, but you don't believe it?




I never said it was all about treating ED. You might want to re-check my original statement, which merely pointed out that ED drugs are not purely recreational. Furthermore, and for the second time, ED is a "medically recognized state," so by your own argument, it is as legitimate as transexuality, which I wouldn't argue.

You seem to think I'm arguing that being trans is not a medical state. I'm not making that argument at all. Again, I only stated that ED drugs are not purely recreational. Anything you argue outside of that statement is a waste of time.

I already elaborated this in my last post .Thou I admit the wording does not communicate it well in my original post. I should have said that I don't buy that that many young healthy men are suffering from ED as opposed to recreation . That's the point I dispute .

Or as Kam put it

Some of them can't, I'm sure.  That's just not what's driving viagra sales overall, or viagra in the service.  It's for fun, and we don't hear alot of bitching..or any bitching, about it. If some groundpounder wants to maintain a rock hard one for a few hours it;s the least we can do for him, it seems. I say the same is true, and imo much more so, of a groundpounder that's been living in a body they hate.