More Race Hysteria from SJW's

[The Grand Nudger]

It's not as simple as them being intolerant of intolerance, it's their behavior towards their own and towards their opponents and the way they oppose them. Both of which I've covered previously. 

How do you think they should treat bigots?  I laugh in their face and remind them that they're a joke.  That's my thing, lol.  

Just what I said. She wanted to open up conversation with her political adversaries and in return she got rail roaded by her own compatriots for not towing the line.

I don't think you did even the quickest google search on that.  It would be impossible for you to think that you've summarized what happened, with the above, if you had.  She got "railroaded" for shit she took it upon herself to say, things that were so diametrically in opposition to what she had cultivated her base from that the subsequent fallout was an inevitability.  Thankfully, she landed softly in the much more profitable alt right..and now runs cover for her anti-feminist boyfriend.....lol. 

Gee, can't see why -that- might have gotten her fans feathers ruffled.  

I think both sides are fostering the us and them mentality is what I mean. Sure it's the bigot's main issue, but does acting like them towards them help or exacerbate the situation? I can't propose a solution myself because it's beyond me but the answer is obvious to this question. 

You're going to have to be a little more specific as to what "acting like them" means.  "The situation", as I see it, is that there are bigots amongst us.  More than we'd like to admit...and they notoriously wont admit it to themselves.  Accommodating them exacerbates that situation.  

Censorship, for one. 

Such as....?

Definitely better than how it came across at least. 

I aim to please.

What is it that you're after? Names? Addresses? I've described the general lay of the land pretty well in previous posts. 

Sure, a name of a specific sjw being part of the problem with sjw culture.  I think it's important to a discussion of the problem with sjw culture to see an actual example of an sjw actually being a problem.  We may not ultimately agree, but at least I'd have a better idea what you're referring to.  

I'd say it does but that's subjective isn't it? 

Not really, and I get pretty aggressive when I see a person building a back door to exit from........

Sure, as a business owner or school you can screen things as you see fit and as a citizen you can protest or pull your patronage but if you are actively silencing someone who has attained permission from the proper channels at that venue or has funded use of a space themselves by attacking them or charging the stage, taking their mic away or causing such a scene that the police shut it down... what kind of precedence does that set?

If protesters manage to cause such a scene that police shut down a bigot rally....I call that effective protest.  If someone attacks a speaker, I call it assault.  Pretty sure our laws do too.  

What can you expect when enough people disagree with you or someone that espouses your views? I'm not even talking "the golden rule" here I'm saying do you not think these things could be used against you as well? Do you think people wouldn't take notice of this being an accepted practice? 

I can expect to find my own voice drowned by all of theirs.  Bigots -do- use our system to subvert our system.  To them, that's pretty much the only value of our system......otherwise they think it's pretty shitty for not being bigoted enough for their liking.

"We don't agree with you so you don't get to speak." 

Probably not an accurate summary of their reasons for refusing a given person a platform.............

There are plenty of people I don't agree with, bigots chief among them. That being said, they can speak until they're blue in the face, especially if they paid to do so. 

-and they do.......but..really, whether or not they paid their money to say racist shit to a crowd means very little to me.  They can speak until they're blue in the face and protesters can drown their voice out chanting their own slogans.  No amount of money changes that..and if you're going to comment on silencing the opposition....referring to monies paid probably isn't a good idea, since you'd be talking about a person paying enough money, literally, to make sure there is no counterpoint present.  

Maybe it's because you're wording it like a dickhead would. The second time around no less. Say what you mean.

If it helps, imagine me smiling with whiskey in hand.