(December 7, 2017 at 2:03 pm)Grandizer Wrote: I don't necessarily fully agree with harm-based morality, but it is objective in the sense that if there is harm involved, then it's not a good thing. Harm, bad. No harm, not bad. Objective morality need not be grounded in a person, it can be grounded in concepts such as pain or harm.
Mmmmm, no. You must ground the notions of pain and harm in some larger principle defining what constitutes harm and the circumstances that determine if pain is desirable (e.g. warning of injurious danger) or undesirable as unnecessary suffering.