(December 9, 2017 at 11:32 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(December 9, 2017 at 2:35 am)Grandizer Wrote: Uh, thats you strawmanning me by committing a non sequitur. Not my problem if you cant read.
I don't understand, could you please explain where the non sequitur was, and how you think that straw manned you?
And if you where not talking about the moral argument for God, then I apologize. If you where; then talking about a system of knowing, means you don't understand the argument you are attempting to assail, and are just looking foolish by attacking the other poster saying they don't know what they are talking about.
Sure, here's what you basically did.
P1. Grandizer said that the "divine command theory" has lots of problems, including lack of accessibility to God's moral system.
P2. Grandizer earlier mentioned something about objective vs. subjective and how other people did not understand the distinction.
C. Grandizer did not understand the distinction between objective vs. subjective, since Grandizer sad stuff about how the "divine command theory" has problems.
Do you see now how the conclusion doesn't follow from the premises, and how you strawmanned me in the process?