(July 22, 2022 at 1:35 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote:"Fine-tuning isn't based on repeatable, verifiable evidence, it's a thought experiment."(July 22, 2022 at 1:15 pm)Billy Bob Wrote: So then how did it know to get things so right that if it were slightly different to 120 decimal places, we wouldn't have a universe we have today? You don't have any idea what you're talking about to get that preciseness. From the same person who never addressed how we even got the creation of the universe to begin with, nor how we got life on earth, etc. You just treat this with your little flippant remarks that are not backed up.
Fine-tuning isn't based on repeatable, verifiable evidence, it's a thought experiment. If this is the only universe and if the physical laws of this universe could have been different and if the values of the physical laws are unrelated to each other and if there aren't any other configurations of those laws that would allow a universe that could support some kind of life; then it's extremely improbable that this universe would support life.
That's a lot of ifs. And an omnipotent being doesn't need a universe that can support life to have life. It could have us living happily inside black holes if it wanted. A universe which can support life is the only type of universe that doesn't need an omnipotent designer to explain how life can exist there. And if the universe WAS purposely designed to support life, having 99.999999999999999999999999+% of it be hostile to life seems an odd design choice.
No, the physics IS going by science. Amazing how you throw things out with nothing to back you up.
"If this is the only universe and if the physical laws of this universe could have been different and if the values of the physical laws are unrelated to each other and if there aren't any other configurations of those laws that would allow a universe that could support some kind of life; then it's extremely improbable that this universe would support life."
Going by what we know, this is the only universe. Going but what we know we would not have life unless the universe was finely tuned. You just made another useless claim as you ignore everything else too.
"And an omnipotent being doesn't need a universe that can support life to have life."
Spare me that you have such great wisdom to tell a supernatural creator what they can and can't do.
"And if the universe WAS purposely designed to support life, having 99.999999999999999999999999+% of it be hostile to life seems an odd design choice."
Do tell me what universe you created that beat the one we have. You're just a joke filling in space.
