(January 6, 2018 at 9:15 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote:(January 6, 2018 at 9:00 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: You're acting like a real nut job.
Nope, I ask a single question. Your dunk-and-weave is completely expected.
(January 6, 2018 at 9:02 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Yeah, not sure why he won't answer or why he keeps acting as though we can't read it lol.
If you can read one sentence then you can answer that sentence.
(January 6, 2018 at 9:02 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: To the best of my knowledge yes... I don’t believe that this is true. If it is, then I want to address and correct the issue.
You are making very broad and vague generalizations. I don’t think your accusation of dancing around the facts have much substance, if you don’t offer some type of facts or at minimum a falsifiable claim. At best you have a feeling and a seemingly poorly defined one at that.
I think you just digging a deeper hole, if you don’t address what others say, and keep doubling down on, with little of anything of substance.
It's not vague, it's quite succinct. You're inability to reply is just the entertaining part.
You know exactly what you're doing with dodging our question and trying to turn it around on us saying we are not "reading the OP correctly." Extremely immature of you.
Anyway, clearly you are not interested in discussion. I would suggest RR and Neo not waste their time.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
