My conclusions about weak Atheism.

[Amarok]

It's a stance that not only says it's without belief of God.

Nope 

It's a stance that ultimately is neutral to what is the true nature of a human (for example, whether it's spiritual or not).

Nope

For example, weak Atheists would say they don't know if they have a real soul in the sense religious believe.

Yup

It's ok to not know. But What I don't understand, is the assumption no human can know they are soul, simply because you don't.

WTF

It's very rational in fact to say if we are soul, it would be one of the more apparent things to realize.

Not really no

My conclusion in weak Atheism, is they are trying to give intelligence and knowledge to a stance of ignorance.

Then it's a bad conclusion 

I don't know is fine. But to make it the staying place.  

Till you have a reason think otherwise it is rational

None of us in our lives I think weren't Atheists in the weak sense. We all wondered at some point in our lives, if God truly exists or not, and were inclined one way or another, but didn't really believe one way or another.

That's too simple

I know as a child, I questioned God, I even did it explicitly to my parents, where I asked questions, and I understood evolution before I even heard of it. It was a theory I understood and assumed possible, before even hearing it (I was 6 years old when I asked "why does the world have to be created, if God can exist always, why not the universe?").

And then you apparently went nuts 

But I know then there could be so many reasons that I don't know which is why I brought up to my parents who didn't have a good answer.

Uh huh 

I even realized then, they weren't to guide me regarding this, if I were to know the truth regarding it.

Your wandering into crazy land 

6 years old. Some people never grow up though 

Yes you clearly never grew up 

---

No rather I see how you guys react and try to avoid the truth. And it's convenient how you guys just label it all babble after the discussion is over.

Or there is the more obvious fact that it is babble even during the supposed discussion (you ranting us correcting your ranting at least bits that make any kind of sense) and the fact you have no truth for us to avoid

 

You choose ignorance instead of the leap of faith necessary which is just holding to the truth with the heart and embracing it with full submission over irrational doubt and it's loud unclean whispers.

Yeah I'm the irrational one for not blindly leaping to belief in magic for no reason.