RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
January 3, 2019 at 6:14 pm
(This post was last modified: January 3, 2019 at 6:16 pm by Bucky Ball.)
(January 3, 2019 at 6:04 pm)CDF47 Wrote:(January 2, 2019 at 11:32 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote: That's exactly correct.
It did not happen "by chance".
As was demonstrated in the Szostack video, (which you were unable to even discuss), "chance " was not how it happened.
Once the evolutionary process has begun, (which wasn't even "chance"), the next step is not "chance.
You clearly understand nothing about chemistry, physics, or evolution.
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn1...is-random/
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/daylightat...nt-chance/
https://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrar...ns_faq.php
Always the deflection and obfuscation. The definition you provided was inadequate, and did not address the questions asked of you.
It almost makes one think you don't even understand the questions. *That* couldn't be, no could it ?
LMAO
You're a total fraud.
I've known it since you first response to my post where you blustered about a "string of logical fallacies" which you couldn't even name.
Quote:Something is either designed or is not. That is my point. Natural selection is an un-designed process, thus, un-directed.
Actually that was NOT your "point". You used the word "chance". That is wrong.
Common ancestry is well-supported by the very same evidence that is accepted in science and law, the world over. DNA
Natural selection is not designed, except in-so-far, that what is selected for, promotes survival in the specific natural environment where the selecting is going on.
That is not chance either.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist